The Construction of Meaning and Biological Reality of Ghurab and Hudhud in the Scientific Semantic Analysis of the Qur'an
Keywords:
Crow, Hoopoe, Contextual Semantics, Toshihiko Izutsu, Scientific ExegesisAbstract
This study is based on the fact that Qur’anic interpretation often separates linguistic analysis from scientific approaches, even though both can be integrated to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of the terms ghurāb and hud-hud. The research aims to explain how the meanings of these two terms are constructed within the Qur’anic context and to examine their relevance to modern biological studies. Using a qualitative-descriptive library research method, this study combines the semantic theory of Toshihiko Izutsu with a scientific (tafsir ‘ilmi) approach, based on QS. Al-Mā’idah: 31 and QS. An-Naml: 20–22, as well as various tafsir and scientific references. The findings show that ghurāb and hud-hud are not merely names of birds, but also convey moral lessons, knowledge, communication, and leadership values. Scientifically, the intelligence of crows and the environmental sensitivity of the hoopoe align with the Qur’anic narratives. Therefore, this study affirms that the Qur’an employs natural phenomena as a means of moral and spiritual education that remains relevant and harmonious with modern scientific understanding.
References
Abou Zeid, F. A., et al. (2023). Spatial overlap and habitat selection of corvid species in European cities. Animals, 13(7), Article 1192. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071192
Adila, K., et al. (2025). The meaning of the term Al-Fasad in the Qur’an: A semantic perspective of Toshihiko Izutsu. Aqwal: Journal of Qur’an and Hadis Studies, 6(2), 258– 277. https://doi.org/10.28918/aqwal.v6i2.13270
Afifah, A., & Nurhidayah, L. (2023). Tafsir ‘Ilmi dalam perspektif ulama klasik dan kontemporer. Izzatuna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.62109/ijiat.v4i1.33
Al-Nefeiy, F. A., et al. (2022). Morphological and functional relationship between the orbital gland and olfaction in Upupa epops (hoopoe) and Bubulcus ibis (cattle egret). Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia, 51(6), 793–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/ahe.12855
Annessi, M., De Biase, A., et al. (2022). Diet and foraging ecology of the hoopoe Upupa epops in a Mediterranean area of central Italy. Avocetta, 46(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.30456/avo.2022202
Argadinata, A. C., & Hudaeva, A. R. (2024). Pendekatan semantik Toshihiko Izutsu: Konsepsi agama (dīn) sebagai kepatuhan. Humanitis, 2(6), 1315–1330.
Armainingsih. (2016). Studi tafsir saintifik: Al-Jawāhir fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-Karīm karya Tantawi Jauhari. Jurnal At-Tibyan.
Bahri, M. S. (2022). Relasi agama dan sains dalam tafsir ‘Ilmi Kementerian Agama RI [Tesis magister tidak dipublikasikan]. Institut PTIQ Jakarta.
Benmazouz, I., et al. (2021). Corvids in urban environments: A systematic global literature review. Animals, 11(11), Article 3226. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113226
Brown, C., & Laland, K. (2019). Social learning in corvids: A review. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 73(4), 45–60.
Clayton, N. S., & Emery, N. J. (2007). The social life of corvids. Current Biology, 17(16), R652–R656.
Emery, N. J., & Clayton, N. S. (2004). The mentality of crows: Convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes. Science, 306(5703), 1903–1907.
Erlina, L., & Saputra, A. (2023). Pure science dalam wacana tafsir ‘Ilmi dan I‘jāz ‘Ilmi. ZAD Al-Mufassirin, 5(1), 38–59.
Hamzah, M. S. B., et al. (2025). Moral and ecological education in the Qur’an’s crow narrative.
TARBAWY, 12(2), 247–258.
Hunt, G. R. (1996). Tool use by the New Caledonian crow. Nature, 379, 249–251.
Izutsu, T. (1964). God and man in the Qur’an: Semantics of the Qur’anic Weltanschauung. Keio University Press.
Izutsu, T. (1966). Ethico-religious concepts in the Qur’an. McGill University Press.
Jønsson, K. A., et al. (2012). Brains, tools, innovation and biogeography in crows and ravens. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 12, Article 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-72
Laland, K. N. (2004). Social learning strategies. Animal Learning & Behavior, 32(1), 4–14.
Mawarti, T. F. (2022). Tafsir saintifik. Tafsere.
Mosdiq, M. A. (2021). Kajian linguistik zoologi sastra Al-Qur'an [Tesis tidak dipublikasikan].
Ning, C. (2025). Corvid intelligence and social complexity. Theoretical and Natural Science, 73, 64–75.
Putra, R. M., & Jawhariyah, W. (2024). Dinamika perkembangan tafsir ‘Ilmi di Indonesia. MALAY Studies, 3(2).
Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and modernity: Transformation of an intellectual tradition. University of Chicago Press.
Rais, E. E., & Amrullah, S. H. (n.d.). Perilaku burung hud-hud (Upupa epops) dalam perspektif.
Rozikin, A. K., & Syakur, M. (2025). Perspektif tafsir At-Thabari [Tesis tidak dipublikasikan].
Rusidi, M. (2025). Semantik Al-Qur’an Toshihiko Izutsu. Al Kareem, 3(2), 17–30.
Safataeni, H., et al. (2025). Rekonstruksi metode Toshihiko Izutsu. Juteq, 2(11), 1632–1639.
Simangunsong, A. A., & Misnawati, M. (2024). Hoopoe in Wahbah Zuhayli’s tafsir. TAFSE, 9(1), 95–108.
Sulhadi, A. (2022). Tafsir ‘Ilmi: Sejarah dan konsepsinya. SAMAWAT, 6(1).
Syafirin, M. (2020). The meaning of ṣalāt in Al-Qur’an. Jurnal AlifLam, 1(1), 10–20.
Syahputra, A. E. A., & Rohman, A. (2022). Karakteristik burung dalam perspektif Al-Qur’an dan sains. Kaunia, 18(2), 63–72.
Zuhayli, W. (1991). Al-Tafsir al-Munir fi al-‘Aqidah wa al-Shari‘ah wa al-Manhaj. Dar al-Fikr.
